Max Houkes vs Edison Ambarzumjan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance shows Edison Ambarzumjan ahead with a win rate of 46.62% compared to Max Houkes who has 43.39%. Could this advantage be key in the upcoming match?
• In terms of returning, Ambarzumjan also leads slightly, winning 43.50% of opponents' second serve points against Houkes' 42.12%. Will this modest edge tip the scales in his favor?
• While both players have nearly similar first serve return success rates, with Houkes at 30.36% and Ambarzumjan at 29.52%, their capabilities in converting these returns into pressure opportunities might play a significant role.
• Under pressure, Ambarzumjan has saved 61.45% of breakpoints, surpassing Houkes’ 52.37%. Does Ambarzumjan have the clutch factor?
• Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Houkes has a higher win percentage, standing at 57.97% versus Ambarzumjan's 50.00%. Could this suggest Houkes has a higher probability of success?
• On surface preferences, Houkes thrives on clay with a 67% win rate, but struggles on indoor hard courts. Meanwhile, Ambarzumjan matches this 67% win rate on grass yet has a better record on indoor hard courts compared to Houkes.
• Considering tournament level differences, both players have a similar performance, but it is worth noting the variance in the average rank of their opponents. Houkes has faced opponents ranked lower (316.3) compared to Ambarzumjan (198.2).
• In deciding sets, Houkes has a significant edge, having won 61% of such scenarios compared to Ambarzumjan's 27%. Will this resilience in crucial moments be the deciding factor?

Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):

In comparing Max Houkes and Edison Ambarzumjan, several dimensions of their games offer insight into the competitive edge each might possess coming into this match.

While Edison Ambarzumjan exhibits a stronger second serve and break-point saving ability, Max Houkes compensates with a higher win percentage and a remarkable track record in deciding sets.

Overall, the surface advantage of Houkes on clay — combined with his above-average record in tight matches — suggests that he could navigate the pressure of this upcoming matchup more successfully than Ambarzumjan.

Given these considerations, Max Houkes is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter based on his overall consistency and resilience under pressure.